Review and delivery are different jobs

During review the client needs to watch quickly on any device and tell you what to change. At delivery they need the final file, in full quality, that they can store. A link handles the first and a download handles the second, and both can come from the same upload.

Dedicated proofing tools add timestamped comments, but they cost money per seat. For many freelancers the combination of a simple link and an email thread with timecodes is enough, and clients appreciate not creating yet another account.

A tidy project structure

Make a folder per client and a subfolder per project. Name versions clearly, with the project, the version number and the date. When the client replies about version two, you know instantly which file they mean, and later you can prove what was delivered when.

A review workflow that works

  1. 1Export a review copy at modest bitrate and upload it to the project folder with the version number in the title.
  2. 2Send the watch link and ask the client to reply with comments using timecodes, such as 02:14 trim the pause.
  3. 3Revise, upload the next version as a separate video and send the new link. Do not overwrite earlier versions.
  4. 4When approved, export the final master, upload it and send the link with a note about the file size.
  5. 5After the client confirms receipt, delete drafts you no longer need.

Draft versus final

StageExportShare as
Rough cut720p, small fileStreaming link
Fine cut1080p, moderate bitrateStreaming link with timecode notes
Final deliveryFull quality masterFile download; see 4K guidance
ArchiveMaster and project filesPremium for permanent storage

Keep it professional

Use a descriptive title instead of a camera filename, mention the length and the version, and make it clear which link is the one to use. If the content is under NDA, say so in the message, and avoid putting client videos in public folders. Anyone with a link can open it, so for sensitive work delete the upload once the client has what they need.

You can add a watermark in your editor for early drafts so only the paid final is clean. This is not a feature of the host, just good practice.

Handling feedback well

Agree upfront how many revision rounds the quote includes, and ask clients to consolidate comments from everyone involved into a single reply. Numbered notes with timecodes are easier to act on than a stream of messages, and you can answer them in the same order. Keep the thread in one email chain so the history of decisions stays in one place.

Paying for peace of mind

Free accounts can lose files unwatched for a long period, which is risky for archives. Premium keeps files permanently and handles files up to 20 GB, which covers most masters. Plans start at 7.99 dollars a month, and the earnings balance can pay for them if you also publish public videos. See the email workflow for how to phrase delivery messages.

Related tools and guides

Related scenarios

Try it with one video

Upload the next draft, send the link and ask for timecoded comments. It is the lightest review process there is.

Frequently asked questions

No. They click the link to watch or download.

No. Comments are not built in, so ask them to reply with timecodes.

Use premium for files up to 20 GB, or split the master.

It is unlisted but not password protected, so only send it to the people who should see it.